Argument Statement
In the article “Shifting the Paradigm from Deficit Oriented Schools to Asset Based Models: Why Leaders Need to Promote as Asset Orientation in our Schools”, written by Shannon Renkly and Katherine Bertolini, the authors argue that it would be beneficial for students to learn in an environment that focuses on an asset-based model rather than using the deficit model. The deficit model is a more reactive method that focuses on the risky behaviors of students and limitations, whereas the asset model encourages students to discover and apply the “jewels (skills, talents, and interests)” they possess.
Talking Points
In the beginning of this research article, Renkly and Berolini state: “When working from a deficit perspective, the practices and assumptions that emerge tend to cover up the abilities of students and teachers”. Our world typically functions using primarily a deficit model, identifying what is broken and then fixing it. While this may work well for businesses, Renkly and Bertolini have identified that this model is not successful within our school systems. They feel that using an asset model, a system where the strengths and skill of students, would be more beneficial. The quote above acknowledges that if we continue to use the deficit model, we will be missing the great things students have to offer. When we consider building confidence in kids, being told that you’re wrong all the time is not a way to build them up for their future. For a shift to occur from deficit to asset models, school should encourage educators to assess current practice and adopt ways that focus on positive development.
In the middle of the article, Renkly and Berolini state: “Through multiple studies of over one million students in grades 6-12 performed by Search Institute, they have proven repeatedly that the more assets a student possesses, the more thriving behaviors the student showcases and the less likely that student will exhibit risky behaviors”. This portion of article focuses on the importance of families, communities and schools coming together to encourage student to explore their assets and the importance of positive adult relationships. The article then discusses the decline in assets student list possess as they get old with the biggest decline in middle school. This is related to decline in support as students get older. The success in the earlier years has a large impact on high school success.
Toward the end of the article, Renkly and Berolini state: “These include having high expectations for your students, convincing them that these expectations are attainable, helping them remove their fear of failure by encouraging them to fail forward, setting small and attainable goals, and celebrating success when those goals are met before moving forward further.” This refers to the impact teachers have on students in the classroom and strategies that can be useful when helping a student identifying their assets. The phrase “fail forward” really stood out to me. I think it is important to learn how to handle our failures or criticism early on and pivot into something positive.
ConnectionsThis article made me think through my own process and how to better incorporate the asset model at school, in the hospital and at home. While doing more research on this topic, the Social Emotional Learning classes that are offered to the middle school students in our district came to mind. While the structure of the school system is heavily based on the deficit model that Renkly and Berolini discuss, I think this is a way to introduce the asset model. SEL courses provide students with support and skills to identify the “jewels” and apply them. Below are links to CASEL Framework and RIDE information related to SEL curriculum.





